BY ARUL LOUIS
NEW YORK, NY (IANS) – An Indian diplomat has described Pakistan Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari’s off-topic reference to India at the Security Council as a “Pavlovian response”.
“Pakistan Representative made unwarranted remarks, which symbolize nothing, but a Pavlovian response aimed to misuse any forum, and every topic, to propagate false and malicious propaganda against my country,” Rajesh Parihar, a Counsellor at India’s UN Mission, said to the Council on May 19.
He was responding to Bilawal Bhutto’s detour from the Council debate’s topic of Conflict and Food Security to raise the delimitation of electoral constituencies in Kashmir, calling it “an assault on the United Nations, the Security Council and its resolutions” and describing the Union Territory as “illegally occupied”.
Parihar said: “The Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh were, are and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India. This includes the areas that are under the illegal occupation of Pakistan.”
“No amount of rhetoric and propaganda from any country can deny this fact,” he added.
As for Islamabad’s role, he said: “The only contribution that Pakistan can make is to stop state-sponsored terrorism.”
Parihar’s 129-word statement did not mention Bilawal Bhutto’s name and lacked the rhetorical flourishes of previous right-of-reply statements made by more junior diplomats to Pakistani leaders inserting Kashmir into UN proceedings.
Criticizing the Council, Bilawal Bhutto said: “Kashmir has become a symbol of the dysfunction of this institution and this Council”, adding: “The inaction of this body as the internationally recognized disputed status of the region is undermined.”
The Council’s “inaction” could relate to its Resolution 47 adopted on April 21, 1948, which asked Pakistan to withdraw its “tribesmen” and nationals from Kashmir and not give aid to those fighting there.
Bilawal Bhutto said that “Pakistan relied heavily on wheat and fertilizers from the region (of Ukraine” and “our farmers are suffering and so are our people”.
While his country’s farmers are unable to grow enough food to meet even the country’s needs, unlike Indian farmers who produce enough for their countrymen and for sending to needy nations, he asserted: “We challenge those that worry about food security: Resolve the Kashmir dispute, open the door to peace in South Asia and watch how the farmers of Pakistan and India can feed the world.”